KESARI INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITEDEnvironmental Infrastructure Services
Environment Management & Mitigation Plan

Environmental Risk Management: identifying what can go wrong, and what happens when it does.

Environmental risk management identifies the credible failure scenarios at a site, estimates their consequences, and sets out the controls and emergency arrangements that reduce them.

What it is

Routine operation is managed by the Environment Management Plan. Risk management deals with the abnormal: a loss of containment, a fire or explosion involving hazardous chemicals, a tank or pipeline failure, an effluent treatment bypass, a tailings or ash pond breach. The work is to identify credible scenarios systematically, estimate consequence distances and severity, judge the tolerability of the resulting risk, and specify prevention and mitigation controls, with emergency preparedness as the last layer rather than the first response.

KIPL carries out risk assessment as a chapter of an EIA where the Terms of Reference require it, and as a standalone exercise for operating sites, insurers and lenders. Where a facility holds hazardous chemicals above the threshold quantities set under the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules 1989, a further set of statutory duties attaches, including on-site emergency planning and safety reporting. And identifying that status correctly is the first thing the assessment establishes.

Two consultants reviewing an environmental due diligence report and site photographs

What you get

The deliverables, in hand.

Authority
MSIHC Rules 1989 · Chemical Accidents (EPPR) Rules 1996 · EIA Notification 2006
Typical timeline
Four to eight weeks depending on scenarios modelled
  • Hazard identification and credible failure scenario register
  • Consequence modelling for fire, explosion and toxic release scenarios
  • Risk evaluation against tolerability criteria, with risk contours where required
  • Threshold quantity screening under the MSIHC Rules 1989
  • Prevention and mitigation control specification
  • On-site emergency plan and disaster management plan inputs

Straight answers

Environmental Risk Management: common questions.

01What is environmental risk assessment?

It is the systematic identification of credible accident scenarios at a facility, estimation of their consequences and likelihood, and evaluation of whether the resulting risk is tolerable, followed by the specification of controls to prevent and mitigate them. It addresses abnormal events, whereas an Environment Management Plan addresses normal operation.

02What is a Major Accident Hazard installation?

A site holding hazardous chemicals at or above the threshold quantities specified in the schedules to the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemical Rules 1989. The designation triggers additional statutory duties including notification, safety reporting, an on-site emergency plan and defined information to be provided to workers and to the public. Whether a site crosses the threshold is a question of inventory against schedule, not of judgement.

03What is the difference between an on-site and an off-site emergency plan?

The on-site emergency plan is prepared by the occupier and covers response within the installation boundary: alarm, evacuation, containment, medical response, mutual aid, rehearsal. The off-site plan covers the surrounding population and is prepared by the district authority under the applicable rules, using information the occupier supplies. The occupier owns one and feeds the other; assuming the district plan exists and is current is a common error.

04Is risk assessment part of the EIA?

For projects handling hazardous substances it usually is, the Terms of Reference commonly require a risk assessment and disaster management plan chapter, and the appraisal committee examines it. For projects without significant hazard the requirement may be limited. What the ToR grants determines the scope, so the point to resolve it is at scoping, not at report writing.

05What is the difference between HAZOP and QRA?

HAZOP is a structured qualitative technique that examines a process design node by node with guidewords to identify deviations and their causes and consequences. Quantitative risk assessment models specific scenarios numerically (release rates, dispersion, thermal radiation, overpressure) to produce consequence distances and risk figures. HAZOP finds what can go wrong; QRA estimates how bad and how likely. Serious sites need both.

06What does the Public Liability Insurance Act require?

The Public Liability Insurance Act 1991 requires owners handling hazardous substances above notified quantities to hold insurance providing immediate relief to persons affected by an accident involving those substances, on a no-fault basis, and to contribute to the Environment Relief Fund. It is a distinct obligation from consent conditions and is regularly overlooked by units that assume their general liability cover discharges it.

07How often should a risk assessment be revised?

On change rather than on a fixed schedule: a new chemical, an inventory increase that crosses a threshold, a process or layout modification, a change in the surrounding land use that alters who is exposed, or a learning from an incident or near miss. In addition, emergency plans require periodic rehearsal and updating, and a risk assessment whose mitigation assumptions have not been tested in a drill is only partly verified.

Within Environment Management & Mitigation Plan

Part of the whole route, the other components.

All of Environment Management & Mitigation Plan →

Primary sources

Check it at source.

This page describes MSIHC Rules 1989 · Chemical Accidents (EPPR) Rules 1996 · EIA Notification 2006. The regulation and the filing portal are public, these are the official endpoints, not our summary of them.

Relevant proof

Where this stage has already been delivered.

A chemical plant's administrative block in terracotta, with process columns beyond at sunset

KwaliChem Pvt. Ltd. · TTC Industrial Area, Rabale, Navi Mumbai

EIA for Synthetic Organic Chemical Industry

CTE/CTO application, ToR application, baseline data collection, EIA report and appraisal before the EAC: Category 5(f), the sector KIPL holds Category A accreditation in.

20 → 140 TPMCapacity
Cat A5(f) accredited
See the full case →

Our expertise

One team across the whole environmental brief.

Environmental Risk Management is one stage of one practice. Most projects need several, and the commitments made at clearance are the ones we build and maintain.

All expertise →

Who we do this for

Environment Management & Mitigation Plan reads differently by industry.

Trusted by

The organisations this work is done for.

JacobsAuricSBI CapsAirTrunkColtAECOMShapoorji PallonjiAGPZR2 Group

Bring us the environmental risk management, or the whole clearance.